When that term was first coming into vogue, something like 30 years ago, I had a layman’s view of what it meant. What to know About education on Globalization?
Everybody is wearing similar clothes, living in the same types of buildings, everyone accessing related media, buying similar products, also connected by global communications.
Those are just superficial characteristics, the most apparent signs of Globalization. However, Globalization is really about the integration and interdependence of systems, principally, communication, and financial systems.
Imagine a world where countries are just villages. Additionally, Each village has its mayor, its customs, and its products and services for their town.
Hence, imagine each village gets a PC and vast band internet and is connecting to a system of cameras that are transmitting images and sounds from every town, 24 hours a day.
About Education On Globalization
Ideas spread, opportunities, and needs become known, locations of resources, also the quality of those resources become known. People from various villages begin taking advantage of this newly-available, real-time information, going from village to community. Some ideas become more popular than the original customs and practices of individual villages. Some people also start becoming very wealthy. Other people notice this.
Eventually, these other people begin to realize that serving all the villages, trading with all the communities, having access to all the ideas and resources of all of the villages will produce more significant results. It is happening much more quickly and provides enormous wealth than working with just their town or just some of the communities. It’s the difference between working with a little neighborhood market and global multinational corporation.
But they need to agree on the values and rates of exchange. These people need to decide on the rules of competition and trade. They require confidence and trust in working with the other villages. They develop systems that solve these things. In communication, UN organizations deal with regulating and organizing the internet and other more traditional telecommunications. In finance, The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and the World Trade Organization create a system to regulate credit, trade practices, and quality standards, among other things. Agreements are designed to guarantee that ideas, discoveries, and inventions of every village are protected and rewarded, instead of stolen and exploited by different communities.
However, all the villages are the first to integrate, and some are the most integrated into the system. They become wealthy and prominent- and all the communities eventually want to be part of the system. They are welcome, but they have to agree to the same rules, penalties, and practices.
Soon, there are no barriers between the villages in terms of products, services, or wealth that can be extracted or invested across the lines that separate villages. They form an extensive, integrated system of global communities.
What is the-Ultimate-Result?
The system functions best and most productively when the overall relationship between ALL of the villages is stable. War is terrible for the system.
Therefore, that means two or more villages are becoming less productive and more destructive, and it can spread to other communities. Unhappiness and oppression in individual villages are bad for the system. However, It lowers production and can disrupt relationships with other villages. So, These things create uncertainty and doubts that affect the whole system of communities, and their investment in, and dependence on the network.
So, the result is that villages become increasingly against war, increasingly against oppression, and increasingly cooperative within the world community- this is why economic sanctions have power.
If you want to play in the global league, you have a play by the rules.